Re: alternative to gettickcount

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

"Ulrich Korndoerfer" <ulrich_wants_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23GnSUxSNIHA.2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bob O`Bob wrote:
Ulrich Korndoerfer wrote:


The resolution is below one nanosecond.

Overall, I guess I should be glad I wasn't around when this thread went by.

Precision and accuracy are all too often confused.

Surely you know that resolution and precision do mean the same,

Actually they don't,
http://metrologyforum.tm.agilent.com/specs.shtml

David


.