Re: Question on exe size
- From: dpb <none@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:00:59 -0500
David wrote:
Thank you all for your interest.
To answer a few questions:
1. The number of code lines is 235,733
2. There are no bitmaps or graphics in this programme at all.
3. There are a lot of Active Reports, which I suppose could inflate the size of the exe
4. If I take the code from my new box, and compile it on my laptop, I get a file of around 26mb, 96 on my new box.
5. Compiling from a fresh VB boot doesn't make any diferrence, it's still 96mb
6. Changing the various compile options alters the size of the exe by about 1 - 2 mb
7. Re-loading VB plus service packs made not a jot of difference.
Seems like it is the processor, perhaps I should just go back to my old box. Are there any other native code compilers out there for VB6 that I could try?
I'm wondering if you're not seeing large sector allocation on a bigger disk and reporting that rather than actual .exe file size? The 96 is suspicious number.
See what happens if use p-code instead of native.
VB is MS proprietary so there are no other VB compilers.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on exe size
- From: Robert Morley
- Re: Question on exe size
- References:
- Re: Question on exe size
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: Question on exe size
- From: dpb
- Re: Question on exe size
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: Question on exe size
- From: Steve Gerrard
- Re: Question on exe size
- From: David
- Re: Question on exe size
- Prev by Date: Re: RTF Text vs. MSWord
- Next by Date: Re: update control using SELECT CASE, or IF
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on exe size
- Next by thread: Re: Question on exe size
- Index(es):