Re: Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- From: "Donald Lessau" <don@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:45:28 +0100
"Steve Gerrard" <mynamehere@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Q4ednZ36GKyrLLvanZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Val is nice because it it will read a number followed by text, i.e. 23A becomes 23, instead of tossing up an error...
.... which also has a dark side: e.g. Val("23E2") -> 2300, and Val("23E-2") -> 0.23
Don
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- From: dpb
- Re: Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- References:
- Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- From: Jack
- Re: Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- From: Steve Gerrard
- Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- Prev by Date: Re: querying for max number is a column
- Next by Date: Re: VB6 API Viewer Add-in does not start anymore
- Previous by thread: Re: Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- Next by thread: Re: Val() versus CLng, CInt or CByte
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading