Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: "Mike Williams" <mikea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:40:11 +0100
"Ivar" <ivar.ekstromer000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:wEsSi.15502$8c4.425@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Have a look at the code below, can you do a sort
that is faster than this code can do?
By the way Ivar, the GetTickCount API does not have a resolution any better than the VB Timer function or most of the standard Windows timing functions (a best resolution of about 10 to15 milliseconds on most XP and Vista systems). If you want a higher resolution then you should either use the QueryPerformance stuff or the timeGetTime function, after setting the "best resolution" to 1 millisecond (or whatever you desire) using timeBeginPeriod.
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: MikeD
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- References:
- VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: xx3884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: mayayana
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: Richard Mueller [MVP]
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: xx3884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: Ivar
- VB6 LISTBOX problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Calculate Last Digits
- Next by Date: Re: CONNECT MY VB PROGRAM WITH SQL
- Previous by thread: Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- Next by thread: Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- Index(es):