Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: "Mike Williams" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:25:18 +0100
<xx3884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1192901428.750702.325760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I know adding so many entries to a listbox isn't
ideal, it was purely a quick way to sort alot of data...
Surely you jest! Even a very simple sorting algorithms will sort your 47000 strings ten times faster than dumping them into a ListBox with its Sorted property set to True, and the better sorting algorithms will sort them more than twenty times faster!
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: Ivar
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- References:
- VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: xx3884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: mayayana
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: Richard Mueller [MVP]
- Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- From: xx3884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- VB6 LISTBOX problem
- Prev by Date: Re: SendKeys under Windows Vista with VB3
- Next by Date: Re: SendKeys under Windows Vista with VB3
- Previous by thread: Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- Next by thread: Re: VB6 LISTBOX problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading