Re: SPAM
- From: "Saga" <antiSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:40:11 -0500
One trick I read about (but haven't used yet) is to put the abuse emails
in your post, so when the spiders, robots or whatever they are called
now attempt to harvest your email they harvest the abuse email and
send spam to it.
And yeah, it is bad to respond to spam, but sometimes, just sometimes
things get so hectic that I can vent off by making a lame remark on
the spammer's thread at a futile attempt of humor. In most case, the
spammer has thousands of news groups in his DB and uses a program
to post the spam, so he really doesn't know where this junk is posted,
much less checks up on it to see if it has any replies.
And to the poster who wondered what evisu red monkey jeans are:
http://www.djpremium.com/shop/G1-V74615-R54352/-collection-.html?GGKEY=red-monkey-generic
Here is a guide so we won't be conned by counterfeit evisu red monkey jeans:
http://reviews.ebay.com/FAKE-RED-MONKEY-amp-EVISU-JEANS_W0QQugidZ10000000001405664
(beware word wrap)
Saga
--
"Pop`" <nodoby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:pvXwi.4843$%55.2480@xxxxxxxxxxx
Grand_Poobah wrote:
SPAM
It's better to report spam than to comment on it. Comments often only give readers a reason to go
back and read the spam; something that should never happen.
This one in particular makes it very easy to report, including spamvertised sites that appear to
be the real ones to report, though ymmv. It's either a newbie spammer or one who's chosen groups
they don't think report spams since it isn't widespread on the groups; yet at least.
Duly LARTed.
Pop`
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPAM
- From: Chris Dunaway
- Re: SPAM
- Prev by Date: Re: Command string difference on XP SP2
- Next by Date: Re: RealBasic, is it ready?
- Previous by thread: Re: SPAM
- Next by thread: Re: SPAM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|