Re: Singles to Doubles
- From: dpb <none@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:31:29 -0500
dpb wrote:
...
What then looks like "garbage" in external representation is, in fact what the continuing fraction w/ all numerators zero is.
More precisely, all past those given in single precision are zero...
I also intended to add that again, the difference in what was originally posted is that the string representation brings the i/o routines back into play and forces a conversion from the external ASCII decimal representation (obtained by a behind the scenes translation of the Single precision internal representation to that form, of course) to internal representation and since it is cast to a Double, the full precision is provided, just as if the same decimal value had been written in a source file and assigned to a Double or read into a Double by in Input # statement.
--
.
- References:
- Singles to Doubles
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: Singles to Doubles
- From: Bob Butler
- Re: Singles to Doubles
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: Singles to Doubles
- From: Rick Rothstein \(MVP - VB\)
- Re: Singles to Doubles
- From: dpb
- Singles to Doubles
- Prev by Date: Re: Singles to Doubles
- Next by Date: Re: Problems with Program on version 6.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Singles to Doubles
- Next by thread: Re: Singles to Doubles
- Index(es):