Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- From: "Ralph" <nt_consulting64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:41:11 -0500
"Bruce W. Roeser" <broeser@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23TmXEe0jHHA.1624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Same here. I just have a small website that I keep my bible studies on.2003
The reference table is maintained in a nice little Access MDB on my local
machine here with an ODBC connection set up and, yes, I use Front Page
too - it's *very* nice to work with. In fact I like the entire Office2003
line - they just work.already
Then if I need to get at the database through a VB6 application I've
got a small library of functions written for DAO that make life easy. NoVB6/Access
... I won't write enterprise-level applications with this but for nice
little Windows desktop applications it's pretty tough to beat the
combination.
-b :-)
You're doing everything right except for the ODBC driver (or perhaps
ODBCDirect). Lose it.
ODBC is not optimal for ISAM data stores, ie. mdb files. Use the appropriate
Jet driver/s directly, which are optimal for Office files.
-ralph
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- From: Bruce W. Roeser
- Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- References:
- Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- From: Jeff Johnson
- Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- From: Bruce W. Roeser
- Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- Prev by Date: Re: Listbox scroll problem
- Next by Date: Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- Previous by thread: Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- Next by thread: Re: Any REAL reason to use ADO vs. DAO?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|