Re: vb6 -v- Net!


"Robert Morley" <rmorley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e2Rg3oKbHHA.2172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's probably why he called them "significant". :)


Touche. But the way I took his post was that even though they're
"significant", not enough to prevent switching to VB.NET....and to me
they're significant enough to prevent exactly that.


--
Mike
Microsoft Visual Basic MVP




Rob

"MikeD" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%230Bb3mKbHHA.4656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:mre503h4t8ni0cd2q4hep0tj0b6kdj49i9@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:59:40 +1100, "Aalaan" <veryinvalid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I still work in both environments and the only significant disadvantages
I've encountered with
Visual Basic.NET are:

1) Learning the Framework and new language features (which of course can
be overcome)
2) Desktop apps on average are not as fast
3) Distribution of the .NET Framework


Those are 3 pretty big disadvantages, don't you think?

--
Mike
Microsoft Visual Basic MVP






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: vb6 -v- Net!
    ... I still work in both environments and the only significant disadvantages ... Distribution of the .NET Framework ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: vs .net 2005, .net framework 2.0 - when?
    ... MCSD, Visual Developer - Visual Basic MVP ... How about> .net framework 2.0? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
Loading