Re: vb6 -v- Net!
- From: Paul Clement <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:31:07 -0500
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:59:40 +1100, "Aalaan" <veryinvalid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
¤ In one or two sentences, can regulars explain concisely to this novice why
¤ vb.Net is inferior to vb6, rather than tackle the wider issues such as
¤ ongoing support possibly being removed *again*, what they think of M$oft
¤ etc. I am not paying devil's advocate. After about 650 hours getting to know
¤ vb6, I am a very firm enthusiast! But I want to know whether my time would
¤ be better spent learning .Net. I'm sure I know the opinions of most here,
¤ but I would like concrete reasons that just focus on usability and not
¤ previous wasted development years etc.
¤
¤ I already have an excellent summary from one regular (YKWYA), but would like
¤ to know what the rest of you think. Thanks in advance.
¤
I still work in both environments and the only significant disadvantages I've encountered with
Visual Basic.NET are:
1) Learning the Framework and new language features (which of course can be overcome)
2) Desktop apps on average are not as fast
3) Distribution of the .NET Framework
Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: vb6 -v- Net!
- From: MikeD
- Re: vb6 -v- Net!
- References:
- vb6 -v- Net!
- From: Aalaan
- vb6 -v- Net!
- Prev by Date: Re: Array of Collection
- Next by Date: Re: Updating database and record
- Previous by thread: Re: vb6 -v- Net!
- Next by thread: Re: vb6 -v- Net!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading