Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- From: "Michael C" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:59:27 +1000
"Bob Butler" <tiredofit@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23GNRjSd1GHA.1256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At least as far as development tools go. The fact that MS is leading in a
given direction is no reason to follow. Deprecating Global in favor of
Public was a mistake IMO
Hardly, Global is the wrong term. Global means world wide as in accessible
to everything everywhere. Public just indicates that it is exposed outside
the class that holds it.
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- From: Ralph
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- References:
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- From: Jeff Johnson
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- From: Bob Butler
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- From: Michael C
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- From: Stefan Berglund
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- From: Bob Butler
- Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- Prev by Date: Re: Inter-Application Communication
- Next by Date: Re: Projects window
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- Next by thread: Re: Global Const vs Public Const
- Index(es):
Loading