Re: VB.NET 2002 question from complete and utter newbie to programming
- From: "Deke" <no@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:43:13 GMT
Fairly significant which is why you shouldn't bother with VB 6.0 if you
plan on moving to 2005.<<<
That's kind of what I thought, but I wanted to ask to see if it was just me.
Thanks for the response.
"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:de8nb2t9e9lrh74f5vclngkfo8ngcdrevv@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:20:44 GMT, "Deke" <no@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
¤ What is the learning curve like between VB6 and VB2005 Express?
¤
Fairly significant which is why you shouldn't bother with VB 6.0 if you
plan on moving to 2005.
The biggest challenge is learning the .NET Framework libraries, some of
which replace functionality
in VB 6.0 and others which replace language extensions such as data
access. In addition, many who
never even used VB 6.0 actually have started working with the .NET version
of Visual Basic.
Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: VB5 Question
- Next by Date: Re: unhandled SecurityException in VB 2005 Express
- Previous by thread: VB5 Question
- Next by thread: Re: VB.NET 2002 question from complete and utter newbie to programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
