Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Frank
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:48:54 -0700
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:22:34 -0500, "Ralph" <nt_consulting64@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
in <gt2dnbDJMM4C1ijZnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
It appears MS occasionally does listen and respond to some complaints. <g>
ROFLMAO
Frank
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Bob O`Bob
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- References:
- vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Darren
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Michael B . Johnson
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Michael B . Johnson
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Ralph
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: expvb
- Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- From: Ralph
- vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- Prev by Date: Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- Next by Date: Re: Mike: Restating your explanation
- Previous by thread: Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- Next by thread: Re: vb6 bcoming irrelevant?
- Index(es):