Re: Using with
- From: "Dave" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:44:17 +0100
AGAIN
Your code as given is fatally flawed
I copied it exactly then added another button and copied the code from
button 1 but transposed A&B, then marked the buttons "With First" and "With
Second" then ran it compiled and in the IDE, the IDE results are similar to
those posted before the compiled results were:
"With First"
Run 1: 521,750 (with)
Run 2: 1,052,057
"With Second"
Run 1: 478,486
Run 2: 1,001,104 (with)
There is a problem with your routine, it ALWAYS shows the first run to be
quicker than the second one.
The benchmarking I did however showed that the loops (I chose) were
insignificantly but measurably faster using With. But more importantly my
results were consistant regardless of the order performed.
Dave O.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- References:
- Using with
- From: gary
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- From: Rick Rothstein
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- From: Ralph
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- From: Ralph
- Re: Using with
- From: J French
- Re: Using with
- From: Dave
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- From: Dave
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- From: Larry Serflaten
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- From: Larry Serflaten
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Re: Using with
- From: Larry Serflaten
- Re: Using with
- From: Dave
- Re: Using with
- From: Michael C
- Using with
- Prev by Date: Re: Atbash translation anyone?
- Next by Date: Way to check logged in by week HELP!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Using with
- Next by thread: Re: Using with
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|