Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: "Gary Nelson" <gn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:54:03 +0100
Stefan,
there's no effort to even begin to understand - thus the only conclusion
The problem is not understanding. We're talking about a giant corporation.
Once a decision is taken it is nearly impossible to move it back. Think of
all the work that's gone into VB2005. Who is going to admit that they made a
mistake.
Gary
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- References:
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Gary Nelson
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Ralph
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Ralph
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Robert Comer
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Andre Kaufmann
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Stefan Berglund
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- From: Stefan Berglund
- Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- Prev by Date: Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- Next by Date: Re: Conveting byte array to int array ???
- Previous by thread: Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- Next by thread: Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|