Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- From: DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:29:01 -0500
"MikeD" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:OeHUJFdYGHA.3848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Dan, IMO, this was a foolish thing for you to do. You even stated
"I'll really be somewhat surprised if this installs/runs properly for
many people". I guess you consider that a disclaimer.
And no, I don't consider that a disclaimer. The standard disclaimer is in
the readme.txt file.
I made that comment because over the last several weeks, I had removed
several outside controls to lighten the distribution package, and moved
much of that code inside the main program. Of the 4 PC's I have here they
all had this installed at one point or another for testing and I was not
sure if eveything had been removed on the uninstall operations, so when
installing the new version, if a reference had been left behind somewhere
in the code (which I did my best to verify) it woul dhave picked up the old
existing one that may have not been removed by the Windows Installer.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- References:
- Beta Release, if of interest
- From: DanS
- Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- From: Ivar
- Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- From: MikeD
- Beta Release, if of interest
- Prev by Date: Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- Next by Date: Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- Previous by thread: Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- Next by thread: Re: Beta Release, if of interest
- Index(es):
Loading