Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:14:50 -0600, Paul Clement
<UseAdddressAtEndofMessage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
in <of1r021gosohu5mqfhcv3g38shrim1sfda@xxxxxxx>

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:49:07 -0600, "Dan Barclay" <Dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

¤ <shrug> You are right, they screwed up both and I wish they'd changed
¤ neither. I happen to think core language is more important because there is
¤ simply no excuse to tie that to the platform. As I mentioned earlier, it is
¤ the effect that counts.
¤
¤ You call it unacceptable for your reasons, I'll call it unacceptable for
¤ mine.
¤
¤ Dan

My only point was that they had done it before with language extensions to Visual Basic so I'm not
sure why everyone was so shocked that they did it on a larger scale.

By the time VB 6.0 was released I was on my fourth version of their data access library. ;-)

And that is the lamest retort I can imagine. Nothing about the data
access library changes forced anyone into a complete rewrite situation,
Paul - ever. The worst breaking change was in 2.0 or 2.1 when they
changed the signature of an event routine and you had to change a single
argument in a routine that should never be in a production app anyway
because it involved data binding.

Does someone pay you to make these candy coated statements, Paul?

---
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, no guarantees, and no conferred rights.

Stefan Berglund
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
    ... I happen to think core language is more important because there is ... ¤> ¤ Andre, ... to the extensions would ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
    ... ¤>¤ neither. ... I happen to think core language is more important because there is ... you needed a compatibility layer to use the newer version of DAO in Visual Basic ... None of those object models (or the data binding support if you used it) are compatible. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: advice needed
    ... ¤> of the product. ... Unfortunately for us all the software industry is ... ¤> is an alternative just as Delphi or RealBasic are, ... the core language is still intact and that I still prefer it over the other ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: advice needed
    ... ¤> do) instead of trolling on the answers of others. ... Most of the core language from Classic VB is still in the .NET versions. ... (limited availability of an obsolete product and no money) ... Microsoft MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: Oracle Ref Cursor Issue in ADO.NET
    ... What SQL runs in 5 Seconds? ... If it doesn't invoke this procedure using a PL/SQL block, ... Paul Clement wrote: ... > ¤ Hello, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.adonet)