Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- From: Andre Kaufmann <andre.kaufmann.bei@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:28:58 +0100
TedF wrote: [...]
With VB you can add much more user friendly features with
very little work, while it is avoided in C.
C is much powerful, uses less memory, resources, and drive space.
I used to be amazed with the efficiency, size, no dependencies of C programs.
The MS C++ requires 20 MB .net to be installed, don't know
how large 2005 .net runfiles.
It does not.
The extension, the C++/CLI standard, needs the .NET framework, because it targets .NET.
Plain C++ does not need the .NET runtime.
And currently C++ is the only language I know of which can mix native and managed code.
[...]
Andre .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- From: TedF
- Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- References:
- Another C# vs. VB question....
- From: Dan Hoskin
- Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- From: TedF
- Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- From: Gman
- Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- From: TedF
- Another C# vs. VB question....
- Prev by Date: Re: Seriously OT
- Next by Date: Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- Previous by thread: Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- Next by thread: Re: Another C# vs. VB question....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|