Re: keep interface private to dll?
- From: "Tony Proctor" <tony_proctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:41:16 -0000
Maybe I'm missing something here. I have a Standard EXE with 2 Private
classes in it here. One is an abstract class (and so doubles as an
'Interface'), and the other 'Implements' it. This works fine and both are
Private
Tony Proctor
"Dushan Bilbija" <dbilbija@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:#wZE57MFGHA.216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> hello,
>
> rackin by brain, but can't find a way to do this. i'd like to implement an
> interface, which i can use to perform a handful of common functions across
> related objects.... BUT.... i want this interface to be private to the
dll.
>
> any way to do this? tried, friend functions, underscores, private
> instancing.... nothing
>
> any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> dushan bilbija
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: keep interface private to dll?
- From: Dushan Bilbija
- Re: keep interface private to dll?
- References:
- keep interface private to dll?
- From: Dushan Bilbija
- keep interface private to dll?
- Prev by Date: Re: Seriously OT
- Next by Date: Re: Seriously OT
- Previous by thread: Re: keep interface private to dll?
- Next by thread: Re: keep interface private to dll?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|