Re: Is there a more elegant way to do this?
- From: "Ken Halter" <Ken_Halter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:13:39 -0700
"Patrick Pirtle" <pap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23%23%23NidrzFHA.2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'll experiment with this.
>
> Yes, "mod" denotes (connotes? Hehe) a code
> module in my naming scheme, and probably
> advertises my inexperience. Would you recommend
> using some other convention?
> ----------------------------------------
> MicroStation V8.5.2.38
> Windows XP Pro SP2
> IE 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158
>
fwiw, we use a "slightly modified" version of this document religiously.
Visual Basic Coding Conventions
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vbcon98/html/vbconcodingconventionsoverview.asp
--
Ken Halter - MS-MVP-VB - http://www.vbsight.com
DLL Hell problems? Try ComGuard - http://www.vbsight.com/ComGuard.htm
Please keep all discussions in the groups..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a more elegant way to do this?
- From: Patrick Pirtle
- Re: Is there a more elegant way to do this?
- Prev by Date: Re: creating dll's, using in other projects... problem when recompile dll... help please!!!
- Next by Date: Re: INTODUCTION TO VISUAL BASICS
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a more elegant way to do this?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a more elegant way to do this?
- Index(es):
