Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- From: "Tony Spratt" <tony_spratt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:37:18 +0100
> "End" was left in the language to provide what some people used to call
> "Compatibility between different versions of a language".
>
> Too bad those days are gone. A lot of people wished "End" was removed from
> the language.... well, it has been in B#... along with just about
everything
> else that made VB = VB.
>
> --
> Ken Halter - MS-MVP-VB - http://www.vbsight.com
> DLL Hell problems? Try ComGuard - http://www.vbsight.com/ComGuard.htm
> Please keep all discussions in the groups..
Ken,
It was VB3 I picked the habit up from - I was largely self-taught in that
and never had any training as we progressed through the versions, so
deprecations and best practises largely passed me by. And you can imagine
what I made of VB6 - ActiveXs, DLLs, classes, etc. Particularly as we
flipped straight from 3 to 6 almost overnight :-)
Cheers,
Tony.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- From: Ralph
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- References:
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- From: Tony Spratt
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- From: Ken Halter
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- Prev by Date: Re: VB6 exe is slow on Machine with Win XP SP2
- Next by Date: Re: hash
- Previous by thread: Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- Next by thread: Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|