Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- From: "Ken Halter" <Ken_Halter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:28:20 -0700
"Tony Spratt" <tony_spratt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23SXR8X0wFHA.2656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "A. Ahola" <AAhola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:5004D81A-07B0-4A17-BDCD-88B5563AF8DF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Thanks, this was very helpful.
>>
>> -Amos
>
> Seconded - I didn't know any of that (being largely self-taught) and now I
> can see *exactly* where some of my "memory leaks" in older apps could be
> coming from (these days I'm a good boy and tidy up properly). I always
> though that "End" was just shorthand for "tidy things up and stop the
> app".
>
> Thanks for the concise explanation.
"End" was left in the language to provide what some people used to call
"Compatibility between different versions of a language".
Too bad those days are gone. A lot of people wished "End" was removed from
the language.... well, it has been in B#... along with just about everything
else that made VB = VB.
--
Ken Halter - MS-MVP-VB - http://www.vbsight.com
DLL Hell problems? Try ComGuard - http://www.vbsight.com/ComGuard.htm
Please keep all discussions in the groups..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- From: Tony Spratt
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- References:
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- From: Tony Spratt
- Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- Prev by Date: Re: randomize
- Next by Date: Re: VB6 exe is slow on Machine with Win XP SP2
- Previous by thread: Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- Next by thread: Re: End is bad, mmkay?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading