Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- From: erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx (J French)
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:54:29 -0500, "Ralph" <nt_consulting64@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip>
>Also, it is interesting to point out to those that claim that using the
>_pascal calling convention is a sign of a "Pascal language" influence, that
>_pascal is not the default calling convention for most Pascal compilers.
>Register is. <g>
Personally I reckon that BASIC syntax is far stronger than that of
Pascal or the later offering from K&R - curiously called 'C'
I have a total loathing of 'C', probably because I read K&R's White
Book just after I had understood ASM, which was 10 years after I had
discovered that programming was rather useful.
Anyway - I rather like your disssertations
- especially when they turn 'boorish' (your phrase)
I just wish that Borland would produce a variation that was BASIC
- with in-line 'anything'
<g>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- From: Ralph
- Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- References:
- Native Code vs PCode
- From: Ivan Debono
- Re: Native Code vs PCode
- From: Tom Esh
- Re: Native Code vs PCode
- From: M. Posseth
- Re: Native Code vs PCode
- From: Tony Proctor
- Re: Native Code vs PCode
- From: Ralph
- Re: Native Code vs PCode
- From: Tony Proctor
- Re: Native Code vs PCode
- From: Ralph
- Re: Native Code vs PCode
- From: Tony Proctor
- Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- From: Ralph
- Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- From: Michael D. Ober
- Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- From: Ralph
- Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- From: J French
- Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- From: Ralph
- Native Code vs PCode
- Prev by Date: Re: Get & Lose Focus!
- Next by Date: Re: Shell Command Doesn't Create TXT file as expected
- Previous by thread: Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- Next by thread: Re: Native Code vs PCode OT
- Index(es):