Re: Question about installations
- From: "Les" <vb4@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:01:55 -0400
Hi Larry,
Thx for your input. Just to make sure there isnt any misunderstanding all I
have done in my code was increased the array size from 60,000 to 200,000. I
dont discount the need to always test but in this case it would be difficult
to get on site where the program has been running for a few years. Larry if
all I did was changed the array size in 3 arrays is it possible that the
direct replacement of the exe could cause problems?? I just dont know
enough about the details of what exaclty happens under the hood of the
compiled pkg.
Thx Larry
"Larry Serflaten" <serflaten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uVMA8YreFHA.2180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Les" <vb4@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> > I have put together a project which has been used by the enduser for a
few
> > years. A bug has been detected in the code, actually variable out of
range,
> > and I have corrected the code and now plan on recompiling it to send it
back
> > to the customer. My question is does the customer have to uninstall the
old
> > exe code and do a reinstall of the new code or can I just send him the
new
> > executable and have him just overwrite the old exe file.
>
> You really should test it, shouldn't you?
>
> There are enough variables involved whereby it may or may not work.
Unless
> you want to physically identify and verify all those variables, a simple
test
> would let you know right off if there were major problems.
>
> LFS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about installations
- From: Michael C
- Re: Question about installations
- References:
- Question about installations
- From: Les
- Re: Question about installations
- From: Larry Serflaten
- Question about installations
- Prev by Date: Rich Client Talking to DB on Web Server
- Next by Date: Re: Question about installations
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about installations
- Next by thread: Re: Question about installations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|