Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- From: "Ken Halter" <Ken_Halter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:04:04 -0700
"Steven Burn" <somewhere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23BX6csVZFHA.2756@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Both of the methods suggested will work..... though personally, I tend to go
with modules over classes as I find them easier to work with for some reason
:o\
I'm the opposite. To me, classes are easier. For one thing, there's no need
to worry about variable, procedure or API declarations stomping on each
other if they're private to the class (I guess you can do that with modules
too but...) Regardless, I tend to put stuff in class modules. I like the
ability to instantiate them only when needed.
--
Ken Halter - MS-MVP-VB - http://www.vbsight.com
DLL Hell problems? Try ComGuard - http://www.vbsight.com/ComGuard.htm
Sign up now to help keep VB support alive - http://classicvb.org/petition
Please keep all discussions in the groups..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- From: Veign
- Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- From: Steven Burn
- Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- References:
- Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- From: Vincent
- Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- From: YYZ
- Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- From: Steven Burn
- Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- Prev by Date: Re: VBclassic petition
- Next by Date: Re: Accessing Object Libraries
- Previous by thread: Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- Next by thread: Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- Index(es):