Re: VBclassic petition
- From: "Dave" <Nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:02:13 +0100
> The issue isn't about "support" but rather, it is about MS providing a
> forward path other than rewriting from the ground up, for the existing
> code base.
As far as I'm concerned the issue is will future versions Windows allow VB
applications to run, I couldn't care less if they provide active support or
not, but I need the COM to work in some form (even emulated would do) for an
indefinate period.
.
- References:
- VBclassic petition
- From: Martin
- Re: VBclassic petition
- From: Duane Bozarth
- Re: VBclassic petition
- From: Bruno Köller
- Re: VBclassic petition
- From: alpine
- VBclassic petition
- Prev by Date: Re: Search box at bottom of screen
- Next by Date: Re: Using "Include" Approach for Repetitive Code...
- Previous by thread: Re: VBclassic petition
- Next by thread: Re: void test(void){}
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|