Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: "Michael D. Ober" <obermd.@.alum.mit.edu.nospam>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 02:38:29 GMT
"Galen Somerville" <galen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Oeco6wZVFHA.3140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> "Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:l4r181dlkbg65hba2k036s55kcojded9mq@xxxxxxxxxx
> > On Mon, 9 May 2005 16:43:06 -0400, "Peter Aitken"
<paitken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > ¤ I'm not sure I agree with you. In theory what you say is true but I
> cannot
> > ¤ imagine MS doing anything with the OS to "break" VB6 apps.
> >
> > A lot of folks seem to be banking on that. Unfortunately it's going to
> happen eventually and you can
> > expect quite a few companies will be scrambling to rewrite their code
> and/or simply declaring their
> > current applications obsolete.
> >
> >
> > Paul
> > ~~~~
> > Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
>
> Or not upgrading to the latest Windows.
>
> Galen
>
This will only be viable if you switch to another OS entirely. Try to order
a new PC with Windows NT, or in the case of some vendors, even Windows 2000.
It's getting harder and harder. Eventually, the limitations of the 16/32
bit hybrid called VB 6 will be reached. There is a thread currently running
in one of the VB classic NGs asking if it's possible to get around the 2Gb
limit of VB 6 created files. Before you say that VB 6 isn't a 16/32 bit
hybrid, don't forget that some of the shipped controls are limited to 32765
for max values. This is the upper limit of a 16 bit signed number. Also,
VB 6 will never truely support 64 bit processors, which in the next 3-5
years will become the majority of systems sold. Eventually, we will be
forced by our clients to leave VB 6.
Mike Ober.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Bob Butler
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- References:
- VB.NET Discussion
- From: Sharrukin Amiri
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Peter Aitken
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Bob Butler
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Peter Aitken
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Ken Halter
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Peter Aitken
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: alpine
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Peter Aitken
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: VB.NET Discussion
- From: Galen Somerville
- VB.NET Discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: Resource file
- Next by Date: Linked Table in MS Access shows prior data
- Previous by thread: Re: VB.NET Discussion
- Next by thread: Re: VB.NET Discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|