Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: MM <kylix_is@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:05:12 +0100
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:05:03 -0400, "Peter Aitken"
<paitken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Your commnents reveal that you do not understand OOP. It's a huge time and
>money saver when used properly. Of course you are not alone - a lot of
>programmers don't understand it, and that's the main reason IMO that .Net is
>not taking off as quickly as it might have.
The main reason why .Net is not taking off? I don't think so! Try: a
solution searching (desperately) for a problem. Throw: a tantrum.
Finally: chuck toys out of pram and blame numbskull VB programmers,
all with an IQ of less than a carrot's.
> Many thousands of developers
>have stayed with the old way and are unwilling or unable to learn the new.
Ah, maybe they should be FORCED to learn. Ve haf vays of makink you
join us...! What's it called? Torture 'lite'? That's what VB.Net seems
like to proper VB programmers. I guarantee that if you sit any classic
VB programmer down in front of a page of VB.Net code for the first
time, he or she will wonder whether this is the entry for this year's
April Fool's prank.
>Don't get me wrong, I love the old VB and agree that it is a good choice for
>lots of projects. But it is becoming increasing clear that much of the
>whining about .Net is from people who have not been able to figure out how
>to use it properly. Do not blame the product for your own limitations.
I don't. I blame Microsoft for bringing it out and killing off classic
VB. Just as I'd blame Transylvania for bringing us Dracula and killing
off all the pretty virgins.
MM
.
- References:
- VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Huw Collingbourne
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Paul Clement
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Peter Aitken
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: MM
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Peter Aitken
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: MM
- Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- From: Peter Aitken
- VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- Prev by Date: Re: Parameter isn't passing?
- Next by Date: Re: Parameter isn't passing?
- Previous by thread: Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- Next by thread: Re: VB coverage in new online mag - VB6 or VB.NET?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading