Re: Shareware licensing
From: Veign (NOSPAMinveign_at_veign.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Rick Rothstein: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- Previous message: Veign: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- In reply to: BT3: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- Next in thread: Greg Teets: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:05:21 -0500
>> Locks only stop honest people anyway.
That's the key right there...
-- Chris Hanscom - Microsoft MVP (VB) Veign's Resource Center http://www.veign.com/vrc_main.asp -- "BT3" <honeypot@epmctc.com> wrote in message news:7C2Ud.91018$GT.7199@okepread01... > right. Anytime the code gets into somewhere "significant", it stops to ask > a function if to decrypt part of the Key to see if it is allowed. Sometimes > that is, other times it uses code built right into the already executing > code. Both crackeable, sure, but not without intending to per say. > > I do user rights verification much like Novell does. A database that > contains object rights, etc. That makes the code a bit more tedious to get > around, but sure, still do-able. > > Locks only stop honest people anyway. > And no, I didn't know that about the function names. I don't hack much > anymore. Short of the occasional, been maybe 20 years or so. > > BT3 > > "Veign" <NOSPAMinveign@veign.com> wrote in message > news:ueg5hDCHFHA.3612@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > Really doesn't matter how complicated your Key is. What the cracker will > do > > is just provide a NOP in place of your jump routine and set any internal > > flags to succeed - pretty simple using an program like OllyDbg... > > > > Did you know that VB EXE's store the original function names as a comment > of > > the assembly code? Crackerz will first look for funcition names that give > > things away - like IsRegistered.. > > > > -- > > Chris Hanscom - Microsoft MVP (VB) > > Veign's Resource Center > > http://www.veign.com/vrc_main.asp > > -- > > > > "BT3" <honeypot@epmctc.com> wrote in message > > news:7jUTd.90979$GT.10199@okepread01... > > > I wrote my own "Key" pattern. Good luck figuring it out, but like any > > > other, it has a weakness. Make the most complicated key in the world, > and > > > integrate it into your entire app, but where and how do you store it? > > > There's always a way. > > > > > > BT3 > > > > > > "Elmo Watson" <sputnik@nospamYahoo.com> wrote in message > > > news:%23W6QgX4GFHA.3272@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > I've been looking at Shareware licensing apps and solutions - > generating > > > > license keys, etc - - > > > > In particular - Visual Protect > > > > has anyone had any experience with this product? feedback? > > > > > > > > Plus - if you have any that you swear by - I'd like to know - - too > much > > > > information to sort through, using Google - thought I'd try to compile > a > > > > short list here - - by your recommendations. > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Rick Rothstein: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- Previous message: Veign: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- In reply to: BT3: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- Next in thread: Greg Teets: "Re: Shareware licensing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading