Re: Dictionary Object and FSO versions

From: Jezebel (dwarves_at_heaven.com.kr)
Date: 09/05/04 

Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:01:59 +1000

Oh great. Let's add another layer of complexity and REALLY screw the guy up.
Talk about heaping pellion on ossa!

"Schmidt" <sss@online.de> wrote in message
news:OJ6KuD5kEHA.2680@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
> "Stan Hilliard" <usenetreplyMS@samplingplansNOTSPAM.com> schrieb im
> Newsbeitrag news:e7omj09e1jlib0mhmhpfa9coeapn2961vk@4ax.com...
>
> > I want my application to run on windows 9x, ME, NT4, 2000, and XP. The
> > dictionary object is central to the operation of my application and it
> > would be very hard to change at this late date.
>
> I've written a nearly compatible replacement, wich is faster than the
> MS-Dictionary in all disciplines (Add, Remove, KeyAccess, IndexedAccess).
> It allows own Collection-Wrappers because of an implemented
> IEnumVariant-Interface and has no dependencies (VB6-Runtime only).
>
> www.datenhaus.de/Downloads/dh_dic.zip
>
> Olaf
>
>