Re: DoEvents versus Sleep() inside the Loop
From: Jack (replyto_at_newsgroup)
Date: 05/11/04
- Next message: Osvaldo Rosario: "Re: Networt printers list"
- Previous message: J French: "Re: What objects must I clean up to avoid memory leaks?"
- In reply to: J French: "Re: DoEvents versus Sleep() inside the Loop"
- Next in thread: J French: "Re: DoEvents versus Sleep() inside the Loop"
- Reply: J French: "Re: DoEvents versus Sleep() inside the Loop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:13:03 -0400
I can, but it is not always true. Sometimes user starts that application
first, and then later on the user will start my code.
So there is not way to predict that. It can be both ways.
Jack
"J French" <erewhon@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:40a0733c.94314022@news.btclick.com...
> On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:59:24 -0400, "Jack" <replyto@newsgroup> wrote:
>
> >Sorry, Jerry.
> >It is the latter.
> >It is absolutely independent (not mine) app.
> >But my code has access to that app via trailing commands parameters.
> >My code shuts down that app, waits for its exit from Windows and then
> >restart it with the different trailing command parameter.
> >Hope it explains clearly.
> >Jack
>
> Very clearly
>
> Just one more question
> Do you start the first instance yourself ?
>
>
- Next message: Osvaldo Rosario: "Re: Networt printers list"
- Previous message: J French: "Re: What objects must I clean up to avoid memory leaks?"
- In reply to: J French: "Re: DoEvents versus Sleep() inside the Loop"
- Next in thread: J French: "Re: DoEvents versus Sleep() inside the Loop"
- Reply: J French: "Re: DoEvents versus Sleep() inside the Loop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
