Re: VB6 vs VB .Net
From: Ken Halter (Ken_Halter_at_Use_Sparingly_Hotmail.com)
Date: 03/06/04
- Next message: Bonj: "Re: SQL: What's not to 'LIKE'? (newbie question)"
- Previous message: Bob Butler: "Re: Modeless forms"
- In reply to: Gale Green: "Re: VB6 vs VB .Net"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:20:57 -0800
"Gale Green" <gale@databeat.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ck2i40h67vj9kunhk703g48mm12ujotmcj@4ax.com...
>
> If you let a computer wear out before you replace it, you are at the
> mercy of the suppliers when you try to replace it.
>
> Gale.
The ticket is..... never buy a "computer"... instead, buy new parts as they're released.
Then, all we need to worry about is that some 128 bit processor down the road will barf on
our 32 bit apps. Since AMD's already selling 64 bit processors that run 32 bit software
"seemlessly", I won't worry for a couple of years <g> Or, at least until I stop drooling
over the one below.
AMD Opteron
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8826,00.html
2.2ghz FSB! 17gbs bandwidth! High Performance 32-bit and 64-bit computing ... Bring'um ON!
Gimme one NOW!
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8826_9014,00.html
-- Ken Halter - MS-MVP-VB - http://www.vbsight.com Please keep it in the groups..
- Next message: Bonj: "Re: SQL: What's not to 'LIKE'? (newbie question)"
- Previous message: Bob Butler: "Re: Modeless forms"
- In reply to: Gale Green: "Re: VB6 vs VB .Net"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|