Re: Field size with ADO.NET (XML)
From: John (jkraeck_at_NOprincetonSPAM.edu)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: Heiner Krebs: "Working with the Detail-Section"
- Previous message: Ken Briscoe: "Re: No lower bound question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:00:28 -0400
Well, the problem is in the Crystal KB
(http://support.businessobjects.com/library/kbase/articles/c2010386.asp) and
the tracking number is ADAPT00049953.
I do not suppose that it is likely that "Business Objects/Crystal Decisions"
is going to fix this any time soon since the article was created 2001/11/26
and published 2002/01/17. Way to go Crystal, good customer support there.
Pity, since the use of datasets for reports is such a fundamental use for
the tool. I will be recommending that our third party developer use a
different reporting engine.
Regards,
John
"John" <jkraeck@NOprincetonSPAM.edu> wrote in message
news:OHdaqTmdEHA.1652@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> We have a third-party application that is using ADO.NET (XML) datasets
with
> crystal reports, that is consistently running out of memory when we run
> reports on datasets of any reasonable size. The reason, apparently is that
> Crystal reserves 65534 bytes for every attribute typed xs:string...I
thought
> that this could be resolved by adding simple types based on xs:string with
a
> length facet to the xsd file, but that does not stop the behaviour. The
> fieldsize is still 65534 in crystal.
>
> If you figure 10 fields or so, and 1000+ records, then it is pretty much a
> forgone conclusion the application is going to throw an out of memory
> exception. WTF, I thought Crystal is supposed to be an enterprise
solution.
> What rocket scientists thought up this default?
>
> The dataset is created from various sources, not all of which are
databases,
> so we really do not have an alternate method.
>
> Has anyone else run into this one, and if so, is there a solution.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
- Next message: Heiner Krebs: "Working with the Detail-Section"
- Previous message: Ken Briscoe: "Re: No lower bound question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|