Re: Unicode file name
- From: "Tony Proctor" <tony_proctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:27:04 -0000
It's also disabled/removed on a lot of sites as a potential security risk
Brian. If you're distributing s/w to customers then that's a big
consideration.
Because of this, and the poor efficiency, we have an internal policy to
avoid it
Tony Proctor
"Brian Muth" <bmuth@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OUxaj4MOHHA.3544@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tony, I"ve scanned through some of these postings, and other than a fewfor
behavioral issues (which one tends to see in any technology) I just don't
see anything that would prevent me from using FSO. We use FSO frequently
both scripting and VB6 and have never had issues with it in ourhe
organization.
I think one has to be careful about posting that "such and such has bugs",
since this is how uncorroborated sentiments get generated on the internet
without foundation.
Granted, your point that FSO is not as efficient as native file support
within VB6 is valid, but I don't know if this is relevant to the OP since
never mentions it. There is some marginal additional overhead inmessage
instantiating and using COM objects, but this tends to be greatly
overshadowed by the actual input/output.
Best regards,
Brian
"Tony Proctor" <tony_proctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:%23PI$1nMOHHA.3872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxthe
My evidence is only second hand there Brian. We avoid FSO here for all
http://groups.google.ie/groups?as_q=%28fso+OR+%22file+system+object%22%29+bugs&num=10&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2007&safe=offother reasons I stated. However, the VB newsgroups are full of
recommendations in this area, and of scathing for FSO.
Here's a quick Google on potential bugs:
that
Tony Proctor
"Brian Muth" <bmuth@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ou$PvWMOHHA.960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
message
"Tony Proctor" <tony_proctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:eZQ2V$IOHHA.992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FSO is designed more for script use Brian. It offers nothing to VB
stimulateit
cannot do already.
True. But it is still a solution. I was really hoping it would
the
OP to post his code, but he never did.
In fact, it's another DLL to worry about, it's big, it's
slow, and it has bugs.
I'd be grateful if you would provide me a link to those bugs.
Brian
.
- References:
- Re: Unicode file name
- From: Brian Muth
- Re: Unicode file name
- From: Tony Proctor
- Re: Unicode file name
- From: Brian Muth
- Re: Unicode file name
- From: Tony Proctor
- Re: Unicode file name
- From: Brian Muth
- Re: Unicode file name
- Prev by Date: Re: Unicode file name
- Next by Date: Help on external process invokation in VC++
- Previous by thread: Re: Unicode file name
- Next by thread: VB6 COM service help
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading