RE: Upgrading Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 scalable hosting mod



{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg936\deff0\deflang1033\deflangfe2052{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fprq2\fcharset0 MS Sans Serif;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\lang2052\f0\fs20 Thanks for your reply Alex,
\par
\par Regarding on the further questions you mentioned, I'll do some further research on it. I'll update you if I can some new information.
\par
\par Sincerely,
\par
\par Steven Cheng
\par
\par Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
\par
\par
\par Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
\par
\par ==================================================
\par Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notifications.
\par
\par ==================================================
\par This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
\par
\par \pard\li720 --------------------
\par Thread-Topic: Upgrading Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 scalable hosting mod
\par Subject: RE: Upgrading Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 scalable hosting mod
\par Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:52:02 -0700
\par
\par Hi Steven,
\par
\par Okay, I am now trying out the content db migration. I am trying to follow
\par the "Upgrading to Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 technology" document. The
\par chapter I am looking at is "Deploy a new farm, then migrate databases".
\par
\par There are a few things that I am not sure of as it is not mention in the
\par document.
\par
\par 1) After installing a new WSS 3.0 farm do I need to first create a new web
\par application prior to adding the content db? I am asking because the command
\par "stsadm -o addcontentdb" needs a web application URL.
\par
\par 2) If creating a web application is required before adding the content db,
\par what should be the database name for the web application?
\par
\par 3) In WSS 2.0, I have 1 content db to 1 site collection and thus 1 unique
\par URL each. When I use the addcontentdb, how does it knows what is the URL
\par since I am only providing the web application URL?
\par
\par 4) It says when adding the content db, make sure the root site for the web
\par application is included in the first content db you add? What does this
\par means?
\par
\par Thanks,
\par Alex
\par
\par
\par "Steven Cheng [MSFT]" wrote:
\par
\par > Hi Alex,
\par >
\par > As for WSS 2.0 scalable hosting upgrade, based on my research, seems most
\par > one will recommend content db based migration on a new WSS 3.0 web
\par > application. Here are two blog entries from some SPS engineers:
\par >
\par > #Upgrading Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 Scalable Hosting Mode Server
\par > Farms
\par > http://blogs.technet.com/wbaer/archive/2007/03/31/upgrading-windows-sharepoi
\par > nt-services-2-0-scalable-hosting-mode-server-farms.aspx
\par >
\par > #WSS 2.0 to WSS 3.0 Farm Host Header Upgrade FYI
\par > http://blogs.msdn.com/joelo/archive/2007/05/30/wss-2-0-to-wss-3-0-farm-host-
\par > header-upgrade-fyi.aspx
\par >
\par > Sincerely,
\par >
\par > Steven Cheng
\par >
\par > Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
\par >
\par >
\par > Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and
\par > suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please
\par > feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service
\par > provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at:
\par > msdnmg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
\par >
\par > ==================================================
\par > Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
\par > http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
\par > ications.
\par >
\par > Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
\par > where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
\par > Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
\par > up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
\par > professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
\par > most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
\par > that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
\par > project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
\par > handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
\par > Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
\par > http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
\par > ==================================================
\par > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
\par >
\par >
\par >
\par > --------------------
\par > Thread-Topic: Upgrading Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 scalable hosting
\par > mode
\par > thread-index: AciqERuv5/OXhhPORjqNE372boi/GQ==
\par > X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168
\par > From: =?Utf-8?B?QWxleA==?= <EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
\par > Subject: Upgrading Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 scalable hosting mode
\par > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:53:03 -0700
\par >
\par >
\par > Hi,
\par >
\par > What is the best option to upgrade WSS 2.0 scalable hosting mode to WSS 3.0?
\par >
\par > In the upgrade document from MS, I can only either perform In-Place or
\par > Content DB migration. For the content db migration, if I understand
\par > correctly which is actually like a manual in-place upgrade since I have to
\par > complete the migrating of all content databases before I can start creating
\par > new sites.
\par >
\par > Is there a better way of doing this?
\par >
\par > Thanks,
\par > Alex
\par >
\par \pard
\par
\par }

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Modest Proposal
    ... it seems that personal attacks on me are all you've got. ... So, I get the facts right, and the logic is valid, so ... ... Got any facts or logic to support that opinion with, Alex? ...
    (rec.org.sca)
  • Re: fonction current-date
    ... > I *believe* that an '02 conforming compiler with support for the Screen ... > the "correct format". ... >>> Alex ... >> PROCEDURE DIVISION and need not be mentioned elsewhere. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Cannot Set DMA via hdparm
    ... Hi Alex, ... > 2.4.28 Linux machine. ... It seems some experimental support for your chipset was added in later ... Could you try whether kernel 2.4.24 with the alim15x3 driver available ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Suing Google
    ... I am not suing google by the way ... or with support of others. ... Given your ridiculous childish responses to two people who gave ... Alex Heney, Global Villager ...
    (uk.legal)

Loading