Re: Regarding setup for SharePoint Services 2.0...

From: Juan T. Llibre (nomailreplies_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 01/23/05

  • Next message: Scott Townsend: "Anonymous Acces to only part of Site?"
    Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:43:55 -0400
    
    

    So, that means it's OK to set up SQL Server
    authentication as mixed mode when installing WSS ?

    Juan T. Llibre
    ==========
    "Mike Walsh" <englantilainen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:eNO%23bSSAFHA.2104@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
    > For what it's worth I've just done a Project Server 2003 installation
    > following the single-server installation guide for that product. When it
    > got
    > to the SQL Server 2K installation part of the guide it stressed that SQL
    > Server 2K must be installed in mixed mode because you were going (next
    > step)
    > to install WSS.
    >
    > Something to consider when wondering if MS will continue to support mixed
    > mode or when wondering if mixed mode is a solid solution.
    >
    > (Until this installation I would have had the same opinion as you ...)
    >
    > Mike Walsh, Helsinki, Finland
    > WSS FAQ at http://wss.collutions.com
    > Please post questions to the newsgroup only.
    >
    >
    > "<Todd />" <todd@N*O*S*P*A*M*mindsharp.com> wrote in message
    > news:OXKv5RRAFHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
    >> In my experience, you may have installation problems if you are running
    > SQL
    >> Server in Mixed Mode. But after installation, all WSS functionality will
    >> continue to work if you switch back to Mixed Mode. However, as I
    > understand
    >> it, there are some SPS features (Shared Services, Single Sign On, and the
    >> like) that get real flaky if you are not running in Windows Only SQL
    > Server
    >> mode. I have successfully had WSS running in SQL Server Mixed Mode for
    >> circumstances similar to what you've described.
    >>
    >> That said, you really want to begin moving your legacy applications to
    >> the
    >> Windows Only SQL Server mode. I would doubt very much if Microsoft will
    >> continue support for Mixed Mode in the future. This may have even been
    >> deprecated in SQL Server 2005 (does anyone know?). Think about the
    >> advantages to Microsoft from a security perspective moving to a Windows
    > Only
    >> model:
    >> Complex password policies enforced
    >> Change passwords frequency policies enforced
    >> Domain trusts enabled
    >> Greater access control available
    >> Roles-based authorizations are easier to maintain
    >> Increased flexibility and security for remote employees
    >> PKI-enabled smart card and biometric authentication possibilities
    >> Security groups and GPO capabilities available
    >> ACLs can be set on carefully defined sets of resources
    >> Single security context for the end user
    >>
    >> I'm sure the list goes on. It's only my speculation and I may not have
    > even
    >> hit on the most important reasons but I believe that Mixed Mode SQL
    >> Server
    >> authentication will likely go away completely in the future. But that's
    > just
    >> one guys opinion.
    >>
    >> HTH,
    >>
    >> <Todd />
    >>
    >> "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailreplies@nowhere.com> wrote in message
    >> news:emKhgcIAFHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
    >> > This is probably a dumb question, but...
    >> >
    >> > There's a heading in the "Single Server Deployment"
    >> > section of the WSS 2.0 Administrator's Guide,
    >> > titled "Enable Windows authentication for SQL Server".
    >> >
    >> > Point 6 reads : "Under Authentication, select Windows only".
    >> >
    >> > I don't want to use SQL Server authentication in
    >> > "Windows only" mode as that would interfere with
    >> > other web applications I have running.
    >> >
    >> > Will "Mixed mode" ( SQL Server *and* Windows )
    >> > authentication allow me to install WSS 2.0 correctly ?
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > Juan
    >> > ===
    >> >
    >> >
    >>
    >>
    >
    >


  • Next message: Scott Townsend: "Anonymous Acces to only part of Site?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Regarding setup for SharePoint Services 2.0...
      ... For what it's worth I've just done a Project Server 2003 installation ... to the SQL Server 2K installation part of the guide it stressed that SQL ... Server 2K must be installed in mixed mode because you were going ... > advantages to Microsoft from a security perspective moving to a Windows ...
      (microsoft.public.sharepoint.windowsservices)
    • Re: MSDE does not work for XP power user
      ... the security is set to 'SQL Server security' and the default user's ... You need to explicitly enable it during installation or after installation, until then, the "sa" user name and password cannot be used to connect to SQL Server MSDE. ... Or look into registry to determine if mixed mode is enabled. ...
      (microsoft.public.sqlserver.msde)
    • Re: MSDE does not work for XP power user
      ... the security is set to 'SQL Server security' and the default user's ... You need to explicitly enable it during installation or after installation, until then, the "sa" user name and password cannot be used to connect to SQL Server MSDE. ... Or look into registry to determine if mixed mode is enabled. ...
      (microsoft.public.sqlserver.msde)
    • Customising SQL Server in .Net deployment
      ... I have been trying to customise the installation of SQL Server Express ... I want to change the authentication to ... change the login mode to 2 for mixed mode) then the application works ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
    • Re: Problem using Access Upsizing Wizard .MDB-->SQL Server 2005
      ... As to whether I installed SQL 2005 in the mixed mode, ... installed it as part of a full installation of Visual Studio 2005 ... > account to use for running the SQL Server 2005 service and has nothing to do ...
      (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)