Re: SQL Server 2005 - Standard vs Enterprise
- From: "Daniel Bugday" <itkonsult@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:56:44 +0100
You need to make sure which featues of SQL server you need.
There is no need in Enterprise Edition to cluster anymore because Standard edition could be used in a 2 node cluster.
Check this link:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/features-at-a-glance.mspx
/Daniel Bugday
http://www.sharepointforum.com/
http://www.sharepointforum.com/en-US/Blog/
"Mike Walsh" <englantilainen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23%23cUBYgJIHA.3636@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I doubt if it matters for MOSS or Proj Server 2007. I'd instead concentrate on the purely SQL Server 2005 differences and see if they are going to annoy you if you don't have them all..
(For instance - going back in time - if you needed Enterprise to cluster your databases, then that would be the SQL Server reason even if SP/PS was in the end the appl using that function.)
Mike Walsh
WSS FAQ http://www.wssfaq.com
no questions by e-mail please
Mark Pfeifer wrote:If my client does not want the scalability or more than 4 cpus, is there any advantage going with SQL 2005 Enterprise? What would I be missing with the standard edition? Our environment will be MOSS and Project Server 2007.
TIA
Mark
- References:
- SQL Server 2005 - Standard vs Enterprise
- From: Mark Pfeifer
- Re: SQL Server 2005 - Standard vs Enterprise
- From: Mike Walsh
- SQL Server 2005 - Standard vs Enterprise
- Prev by Date: Re: Branding Guides
- Next by Date: Re: Where to store master page graphics?
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL Server 2005 - Standard vs Enterprise
- Next by thread: Re: Error Event ID 27745
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
