Re: Moss with Active/Active SQL 2005
- From: "John Timney \(MVP\)" <x_john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:22:05 +0100
I dont know anyone who has done this - I'm keen to see if you get a response
as I asked this question at in the MVP private groups and got nothing back.
Unfortunately I never had time to pilot the active\active scenario.
One thing, I dont think you should consider having the DB's in a different
geogrpahical locations (ie. not the same LAN) as the MOSS devices. You
might find on a busy service the latency is just too great.
Regards
John Timney (MVP)
http://www.johntimney.com
http://www.johntimney.com/blog
<john.smith.8234@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187886680.036385.36600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Has anyone out there any experience getting MOSS running on and Active/
Active SQL cluster?
We're proposing to have hardware loadbalancing on the front end, and
the databases in difference geographical locations.
Requests will be routed based upon which is closest. And there'll
obviously be failover.
Are there any good resources describing this type of topology? Any
hiddent dangers we should be aware of?
Thanks in advance,
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moss with Active/Active SQL 2005
- From: Hulicat
- Re: Moss with Active/Active SQL 2005
- References:
- Moss with Active/Active SQL 2005
- From: john . smith . 8234
- Moss with Active/Active SQL 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Change HTTPS bit-flag
- Next by Date: Re: Why authentication before opening a document in document libra
- Previous by thread: Moss with Active/Active SQL 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Moss with Active/Active SQL 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
