Re: MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- From: "Corro'll Driskell" <cdriskell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:37:29 -0400
Obviously, I would be concerned with scaling issues moving forward. Of
course, I concur with Mike's response referencing deployment of a low cost
solution.
"Mike Walsh" <englantilainen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23NxRffbsHHA.5008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My understanding is that it is *any* database. However naturally that is
likely to be a content database ...
I doubt if they seriously expect anyone to run production MOSS using this
thing. They would probably actually prefer that no-one runs MOSS in
production on anything less than 2 servers so it's imo intentionally
crippled.
The version for WSS 3.0 isn't because a single server setup is quite
feasible for that (and it provides a low price entry point is no doubt
another reason).
Mike Walsh
WSS FAQ http://www.wssfaq.com
no questions by e-mail please
AJ wrote:
On 18 Jun, 12:55, "Mike Walsh" <englantilai...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The only issue is in a year's time, theWith MOSS 2007 this would be true (there is a limit of 4GB in the
database size will require you to upgrade to SQL Server
database
size, which I presume is what you are refering to).
However with WSS 3.0 (which you seem to be suggesting he should use)
there
isn't such a problem as the free version of embedded SQL Server 2005
Express
("Windows Internal Database" is the new official name) that you get with
WSS
3.0 doesn't have any database size restriction.
I didn't want to go into that in my reply which is why I just left it
(for
*Moss*) as "I hope you are using real SQL Server" ... (to avoid that 4GB
limit).
Mike Walsh
"SmartbizAustralia" <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182167053.136355.160160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you are hosting this yourself start with Windows 2003 and install- Show quoted text -
WSS3.
You can later move up to Moss, but for the number of users the costs
are quite high.
Even the versions of SQL is not an issue initially. You can run all of
this with SQL Express. The only issue is in a year's time, the
database size will require you to upgrade to SQL Server and by then
SQL Server 2008 might be out.
i.e. Your system will need to grow as the load on it increases.
Regards,
Tom Bizannes
Sydney, Australia- Hide quoted text -
Thanks to the both of you.
I was planning on using the full blown SQL product and not using the
flavour with the 4GB limit.
Is this a restriction of the content database i.e. where documents etc
will be stored. Seems very small. Wouldn't take anyone 5 minutes to
fill this up, or am I mis understanding?
WSS3.0 is out of the question as the customer already has MOSS2007
installed and they want to continue to use this, even though WSS would
be more suited.
Thanks
AJ
.
- References:
- MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- From: AJ
- Re: MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- From: SmartbizAustralia
- Re: MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- From: Mike Walsh
- Re: MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- From: AJ
- Re: MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- From: Mike Walsh
- MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- Prev by Date: Re: Help clear up some SSP confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Content approval on a publishing site
- Previous by thread: Re: MOSS2007 and SQL2005 on Single Server
- Next by thread: Re: Creating KPI Lists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
