RE: Have we hit the wall with Sharepoint?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



Dave
I would suggest removing the webparts temporarily to see if that fixes it
before you take any further action....you never know!

"Dave" wrote:

> Thanks for the replies everyone, we are currently running 5 front ends, an
> index/job server, and two search servers. One of front ends is not in the
> load balancing - it handles the requests from the indexer and runs backup
> jobs only. SQL is a cluster runniing on top of SAN for its disks. SQL
> itself is great, CPU (Quad) nevers runs above 50% even when doing dumps etc.
> The problem is isolated to the front ends for us with w3wp.exe taking up all
> the CPU and memory resources. We have tried more robust front ends(dual
> proc) but that hasn't helped. We have tweaked AppPool settings as well. We
> do have some intensive web parts (4 or 5) on our portal that render every
> page hit for every user and do stuff like go off to Oracle to get data so I
> am wondering if that may be the cuplrit, We are going to split up our
> database too. I will try to find that Joel Olson paper as well. Hopefully
> we will have this solved soon and I will get back here with what the problem
> was.
>
>
> "Dave" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > we have been running a large farm for about 2 years now. We use the SPS
> > portal as our homepage for all users (about 2000) and also use Team Sites
> > (WSS). Our total system size is now 225 GB which I have been told is
> > enormous for a Sharepoint installation. Recently our system has slowed
> > considerably, front end web servers run at 100% CPU for most of the day and
> > adding additonal load balanced front end servers has done little to help.
> > Response time is poor. We still have one database collection since we are no
> > where the limit to split off # of sites wise. In fact we only have about 30
> > WSS sites. Our SQL is a cluster and its performance has been great
> > throughout.
> >
> > Has anyone had experience with large installations and noticed a severe
> > downgrade in performance once they hit a certain size? Any ideas on tweaking
> > performance? We have read Microsoft's whitepaper outlining their settings
> > but there is nothing in there that has caused any improvement for us -
> > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/msit/infowork/spsperfnote.mspx#EEAA.
> > We are also up to date on Service Packs. Sharepoint was great up until we
> > approached 200G in size.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Have we hit the wall with Sharepoint?
    ... I have the Joel Olsen PPT. ... > index/job server, and two search servers. ... SQL is a cluster runniing on top of SAN for its disks. ... > the CPU and memory resources. ...
    (microsoft.public.sharepoint.portalserver)
  • Re: Have we hit the wall with Sharepoint?
    ... > index/job server, and two search servers. ... SQL is a cluster runniing on top of SAN for its disks. ... > the CPU and memory resources. ... >> enormous for a Sharepoint installation. ...
    (microsoft.public.sharepoint.portalserver)
  • RE: Have we hit the wall with Sharepoint?
    ... index/job server, and two search servers. ... SQL is a cluster runniing on top of SAN for its disks. ... CPU nevers runs above 50% even when doing dumps etc. ... > enormous for a Sharepoint installation. ...
    (microsoft.public.sharepoint.portalserver)
  • Abnormal CPU usage
    ... The servers are Gateway ALR 8200 series with Dual P III 600 mhz CPU, ... Problems we are seeing is the perfmon picks up the second CPU constantly ... We used them the same way last year running NT 4.0 and SQL 7.0 and less RAM ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: sql 2005 active/passive cluster options
    ... that is storing data on a seperate SQL 2005 Standard box. ... SQL server had an hardware fault causing application downtime for ... their product is an active/passive sql cluster. ... terms of active/passive failover I need two identical servers (since ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)