Re: Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- From: "Dan Orchard" <daniel.orchard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:25:27 +0100
I tried to mail the doc to your hotmail account and it didnt like it do you
have an alternative email address?
Kind Regards
Daniel Orchard
'jjeffers1@xxxxxxxxxxx'<jjeffers1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1114794600.173787.241100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> I dont understand the relationship between Content Indexes(CI) and
> Source Groups(SG).
>
> 1) When I create a new CI, it asks me to create a SG along with it,
> which would lead me to believe that they have a 1 to 1 relationship.
>
> 2) When I create a new Content Source(CS), I have top assign it to a
> CI, AND assign it to a SG (or create a new SG fot it). This would mean
> that I can assign different CS's in different SG's to the same CI.
>
> What relevance then does the CI to SG assignment in point 1) have?
>
> Thanks for any clarification.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- From: jjeffers1
- Re: Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- From: jjeffers1
- Re: Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- References:
- Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- From: jjeffers1
- Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- Prev by Date: Re: Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- Next by Date: RE: Restore Database schema too old
- Previous by thread: Re: Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- Next by thread: Re: Relationship between Content Indexes and Source Groups
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|