RE: Upgrading to Windows 2003 and a brand new domain

From: Kevin (Kevin_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/02/05


Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 02:03:02 -0800

Eli

Thanks for the info.

However, I cant understand that by just adding the servers to a new domain
that this could cause issues with our SharePoint environment.

The installation is not being moved to different servers, just the servers
being moved to a new domain.

However, that is why i am posting these messages to get feedback on any
issues.

I take Ted's point that it would probably best to test this scenario in a
teest environment.

Any more help very much appreciated.

Kevin

"Eli Robillard" wrote:

> I recently changed domains and SPS became a bit of a rebuild. WSS sites
> migrate easily and perfectly as long as you have the same web parts installed
> on the new server; smigrate is an effective tool for the job.
>
> Migrating SPS was more of a hassle, my experience was that attempting a
> simple backup / restore into the new environment would not work. Since this
> was an early move from an interim development domain to a production domain
> and there wasn't a lot of content, I found it easiest to just recreate what
> I'd built and do a few things better along the way.
>
> As mentioned earlier in the thread, migrating audiences and recreating
> complex indices is the biggest piece of work. In my case I was able to avoid
> migrating most SPS content and simply start it fresh.
>
> Take care,
> Eli.
>
>
> "tedteng" wrote:
>
> > really sorry i cannot give u more advices cos i have no experience on this.
> > how about setting up a testing lab which includes a totally new domain
> > envirnoment and then retore the sps portal to see what happens?
> >
> > br
> > ted
> >
> > "Kevin" wrote:
> >
> > > Ted
> > >
> > > Once again thanks for the quick repsonse.
> > >
> > > At the moment we have not implemented to Audience function with our
> > > SharePoint deployment.
> > >
> > > All we have our customised contributor and Content Manager roles by
> > > department. These are mapped to groups created in our current Windows 2000
> > > Active Directory.
> > >
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > Active Directory Group BPM_Auth
> > > SharePoint Group DPM_Auth
> > >
> > > Would you see any issues with this?
> > >
> > > We have a single SharePoint Portal site with currently two WSS services
> > > sites, do you foresee any issues regarding security etc after migration.
> > >
> > > Thanks again
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > "tedteng" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I did not have this migration experience. I think most of data (content) will
> > > > be kept. But the settings related to users maybe lost, such as audience,
> > > > permisstion configuration... some abolustle links(url) should be changed...
> > > > just food for thought.
> > > >
> > > > br
> > > >
> > > > ted
> > > >
> > > > "Kevin" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ted
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the quick reply.
> > > > >
> > > > > The domain name will be changing from ms.xyz.net to xyz.gov.uk, do u foresee
> > > > > any issues with this??
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > "tedteng" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > if the domian name keeps unchanged, everything with sps should be ok. we
> > > > > > upgraded windows 200 to windows 2003 AD, sps is fine. we did not find any
> > > > > > problems.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > br
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ted
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Kevin" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Could anyone please answer the following question:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We currently have our users and sharepoint 2003 servers residing in a
> > > > > > > Windows 2000 domain, and our requiremint is to upgrade to Windows 2003 and
> > > > > > > create an entirely new domain and move everything into this new Windows 2003
> > > > > > > domain.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Our strategic partner has told us that this would cause problems for our
> > > > > > > SharePoint 2003 environment, though they are very light, well non existent,
> > > > > > > on the details.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone out there know if and why there would be any problems??
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Many thanks in advance
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kevin



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Understanding Mac OS X Open Directory
    ... relies on shared Open Directory domains to provide network user accounts ... other servers that are bound to the domain. ... XEROX Parc for the Smalltalk-76 programming environment, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Understanding Mac OS X Open Directory
    ... relies on shared Open Directory domains to provide network user accounts ... The shared domain can also allow users to access resources on ... other servers that are bound to the domain. ... XEROX Parc for the Smalltalk-76 programming environment, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Understanding Mac OS X Open Directory
    ... relies on shared Open Directory domains to provide network user accounts ... The shared domain can also allow users to access resources on ... other servers that are bound to the domain. ... XEROX Parc for the Smalltalk-76 programming environment, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • [HPADM] RE: Data Centre MIgration with Lot of printers.
    ... If you're physically moving the equipment it ... If you're moving the servers over, ... problems you are likely to come across with the environment. ... We are migrating our datacentre within the city to ...
    (HP-UX-Admin)
  • RE: Career Advice Sought
    ... With the proliferation of servers many companies are ... the field in the mainframe environment it would be transferable to the ... retention, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of the message ... If you have received this electronic mail message in error, ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)