Re: Can't see Enhanced folders after installing SPS 2003

From: Nigel Bridport [MSFT] (nigelbri_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/12/04


Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:45:43 +0100

In 2003, you apply security at the container level, i.e. The document
library. If you really want item level security, then install the Backward
Compatible document library!

Nige.

-- 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Mark Langendoerfer" <MarkLangendoerfer@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in 
message news:A4D5A295-5131-4F52-A0FE-35273D202A22@microsoft.com...
> So does SPS 2003 let you manage security at the document level? With 
> SPS2001
> you could set privileges at the document level. What I need that is 
> critical
> is the ability to set up an approval structure, I also need the ability to 
> be
> able to have an ownership chain so when one role is completed with there
> edits or approval of a document the next person is notified and has the
> ability to accept or reject the document. I've scoured the documentation 
> and
> near as we can tell this ability was removed. I am in a desperate 
> situation
> where my project could be scrubbed if I cannot provide this functionality.
>
> Enhanced folders in 2001 were in network neighbor hood and you could 
> create
> folder structures that were tied in with Share Point ACL's.
>
> I have installed the backward compatible libraries off the SPS 2003 CD
> though I don't see anything changed in the Explorer or document 
> properties.
>
> If anyone has some documentation they can point me to that covers this I
> would be in your debt.
>
>
> "stanley Jiang" wrote:
>
>> what do you mean enhanced folders
>>
>> "Mark Langendoerfer" <MarkLangendoerfer@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote 
>> in
>> message news:E50B1EC1-2D80-412A-96CF-36032C3FB46D@microsoft.com...
>> > I heard that the enhanced folders were removed from SPS2003. Though a 
>> > read
>> a
>> > thread that says SPS 2003 has the enhanced folders from 2001. What is 
>> > the
>> > story? From what I can see there are no document stores in SPS2003 and 
>> > you
>> > can only point to fileshares and index documents though you don't have 
>> > the
>> > file shares you did in 2001. Is this the case?
>>
>>
>> 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: compile+link Fujitsu Linux
    ... I wasn't trying to change your way of doing things, I was answering Charles' question. ... Charles was unfamiliar with Fujitsu on Unix. ... libraries was 'more secure'. ... YOU introduced application security, not I. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • [UNIX] XDR Integer Overflow (Additional Details)
    ... The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com ... were discovered in these libraries during the testing of new Retina ... locally audit applications for the existence of common vulnerabilities. ...
    (Securiteam)
  • Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT
    ... I wanted to point out that with all this talk about ability over certification, that this is exactly the problem ISECOM addresses with the OPST and OPSA. ... Both courses focus on the ability-- applied knowledge- required for those in security testing and security analysis. ... This is why it's so popular with certain industries and government institutions as a vetting tool for new hires and promotions because at the very least, they know from the exam transcript the skill strengths and weaknesses of the candidate for the basic requirements. ...
    (Pen-Test)
  • Re: compile+link Fujitsu Linux
    ... been using dynamic load when required for some some decades. ... libraries when first called. ... file can be used to give greater granularity to the security. ... mechanism _couldn't_ use the unix file system security because it ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: managed string library
    ... respective libraries as well. ... more focussed on functionality and ease of use or "Software Crisis" ... Another security issue is the question of auditing. ... code of Bstrlib) and 2) verifying that the facilities claimed are ...
    (comp.lang.c.moderated)