Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?
From: David Candy (david_at_mvps.org)
Date: 04/30/04
- Next message: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Previous message: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:14:46 +1000
He's burning to CD as he has already said, phil the dill
-- ---------------------------------------------------------- And the band played .... http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message news:6bskc.96$Hs1.41@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > Dmitriy, what I was trying to point out is that normal operation of a Norton > AntiVirus scan should not be a bottle neck; if 7,714 files contining 182 > Mbytes of data require only 1 minute 57 seconds with a Celeron 600, then you > should consider looking for some other bottleneck; page file thrashing, for > example that could be analyzed with 'Task Manager'. > > What exactly is the task that requires 5 X the time with NAV as without NAV? > Your CPU should outperform the Celeron 600 mobile by about 3 times (if your > Pentium 4 is a Northwood.) If you are just transfering from one drive to > another within the same system, then 200 Mbytes of data in 7000 files would > take ~ 10 seconds without accounting for file overhead. If that is the > case, then 40 seconds CPU time used for scanning would increase the task > time by five. But that can't be the case, so the bottleneck is elsewhere. > > -- > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > For communication, > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > replace "dot" with "." > > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message > news:%23eBj$WnLEHA.3712@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > My system has 256 MB of (administrator said, faster) physical memory. My > CPU > > is P4-1800. My hard drive is 7200 rpm. > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > news:Guhkc.17868$e4.4038@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > Back to the performance hit. How much physical memory does your system > > > have? > > > > > > Just for an experiment, and granted that most of the system, program and > > > data are very different from yours, I ran the following - > > > > > > Using Norton Antivirus 2003 (latest definitions and updates) > > > Dell notbook with 600 MHz mobile Celeron (256 Kbyte L2 cache) > > > 60 Gbyte 4200 rpm hard drive > > > 256 Mbyte SDRAM > > > > > > using the 'Framework SDK' folder in Microsoft Visual Studio .NET > (7,714 > > > files, 1591 folders, 182 Mbytes Data) > > > > > > the CPU time utilized for scanning by NAVW32.exe was 1 minute 57 > seconds, > > > and the bottle neck was the relatively slow hard drive. > > > > > > At least the dataset seems close to yours. All this leads me to think > you > > > have some performance bottle neck other than the processing time > required > > by > > > the NAV scan. > > > -- > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > For communication, > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message > > > news:eS4MPXeLEHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > It's not possible. > > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > > > news:FA5kc.13973$eZ5.11479@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > > > Is it possible for you at your level of system access to exclude > > certain > > > > > file types from scanning? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > > > For communication, > > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Previous message: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|