Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?
From: Phil Weldon (notdisclosed_at_example.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Previous message: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:07:15 GMT
Free with your unsupported accusations aren't you. On balance, I'd say
you're not fitted to be a gate-keeper.
-- Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom For communication, replace "at" with the 'at sign' replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." replace "dot" with "." "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message news:O9yBxBhLEHA.2576@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Well Dimitry been trying to get round his admin for years. He asks questions here that only his admin knows the answer too. He did it when he was a 98 user, a ME user, and now as an XP user. He usually withholds as much information as possible. This is the first time he's admitted he is engaging in unethical behaviour though I've suspected for years. -- ---------------------------------------------------------- And the band played .... http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message news:cDakc.14230$eZ5.6460@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > So far, your posts are inappropriate for any forum listed in the headers. > Your thinking is insular, but, then, that is to be expected. > > -- > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > For communication, > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > replace "dot" with "." > > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > news:e986zGgLEHA.2976@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Another ethically challenged, spelling retarded, war criminal yank. > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------- > And the band played .... > http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > news:5e9kc.14126$eZ5.3023@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > What the hell are you talking about, and where are you talking from, and > > what possible connection is there between whatever system of 'law' you're > > babbling about have with whatever system of law is in effect where Dmitriy > > works? And a hell of a lot more people spell jail correctly than spell it > > alternately goal. Do you spell fish 'ghoti' also? > > > > -- > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > For communication, > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > > news:%23ms7VveLEHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > You know that what you want is illegal with 5 years gaol (jail if you > can't > > spell) time. If I help I'm conspiring with you. Take the hint and stop > > trying to act illegally. > > > > Ten year prison sentences will apply to the "unauthorised modification > > of data with intent to cause impairment" and the "unauthorised > > impairment of electronic communication". Meanwhile, a person found > > guilty of "possessing data with intent to commit a computer offence" or > > the "producing, supplying or obtaining data with intent to commit a > > computer offence" faces up to three years in prison.=20 > > > > Up to two years in prison awaits anyone found guilty of "unauthorised > > access to or modification of restricted data in a computer" or the > > "unauthorised impairment of data held in computer disk, credit card or > > other device".=20 > > > > Turning off virus checking that is enforced is "unauthorised modification > > of data [ie the setting] with intent to cause impairment" > > > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > And the band played .... > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html > > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message > > news:eS4MPXeLEHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > It's not possible. > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > > news:FA5kc.13973$eZ5.11479@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > > Is it possible for you at your level of system access to exclude > certain > > > > file types from scanning? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > > For communication, > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Previous message: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|