Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: Dmitriy Kopnichev (kopn_at_hotbox.ruDELETE)
Date: 04/29/04 

Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:28:21 +0400

I have Windows 2000 Professional Resource Kit.
"Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message
news:ky5kc.13971$eZ5.7137@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Sorry, another typo. The first sentenced should read "I use Windows 2000
> Professional and Windows 2000 Professional Server..." Windows 2000
> Professional is the second Windows NT based Microsoft operating system,
> preceeding Windows 2000 XP. The two operating systems are similar, and
the
> "Windows XP Professional Resource Kit" should help answer your questions
> about performance monitoring and analysis. Unfortunately the cost is
about
> $70 US, but it is THE book that should be provided as the manual with
> Microsoft Windows XP Professional Operating system... it's just unbundled
to
> save the average user the extra money.
>
> --
> Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom
> For communication,
> replace "at" with the 'at sign'
> replace "mindjump" with "mindspring."
> replace "dot" with "."
>
>
> "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message
> news:uHxQq0aLEHA.2012@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > What is the 'Process Viewer' (Pviewer.exe)?
> > What does "I use Windows 2000 Professional and Windows 2000
Professional"
> > mean?
> > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message
> > news:reWjc.16566$e4.10545@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > I use Windows 2000 Professional and Windows 2000 Professional, and I
use
> > the
> > > 'Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Resource Kit', a 3 kilogram book
> and
> > > CD-ROM that is a good source of answers for such questions. I'm sure
> the
> > > 'Windows XP Professional Resource Kit' is just as good. The book I
have
> > has
> > > 165 pages on monitoring and analyzing performance.
> > >
> > > There are about 20 columns selectable in 'Task Manager', and the
> 'Process
> > > Viewer' (Pviewer.exe) is also useful.
> > >
> > > Windows XP 'Help' should give information on how to use performance
> > counters
> > > for trouble shooting bottlenecks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom
> > > For communication,
> > > replace "at" with the 'at sign'
> > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring."
> > > replace "dot" with "."
> > >
> > >
> > > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message
> > > news:uaGKd3SLEHA.2068@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > > > What Columns to use to find out where the bottleneck is? How to know
> by
> > > > numbers in the Column where the bottleneck is?
> > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:cIOjc.16060$e4.4579@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > > > Sorry for the typo. The I/O bandwidth should be 1 Mbit per
second,
> > not
> > > 1
> > > > > MByte per second. The Amdahl/Case Rule is a 'rule of thumb' like
> > > 'Moore's
> > > > > Law, and only approximate. A 'Northwood' 1.8 GHz Pentium might
have
> > > 2,400
> > > > > MIPS, indicating 2.4 GBytes memory and 2.4 GBits I/O bandwidth by
> the
> > > > > Amdahl/Case Rule. The I/O bandwidth for a 32-bit, 33 MHz PCI bus
> > would
> > > be
> > > > > 32 X 33 MHz ~= 1 GBit/second. The I/O bandwidth for a 32-bit 66
MHz
> X
> > 8
> > > > AGP
> > > > > bus would be ~= 16 GBit/second, but much of the AGP bus bandwidth
is
> > > > unused
> > > > > for most applications. A 66 MHz 64-bit PCI bus is available on
> server
> > > > > motherboards and a faster replacement for the PCI bus is soon to
> > appear
> > > in
> > > > > general motherboards; server applications approach the 1 MByte per
> > MIPS
> > > > > ratio, and for general workstation use, the 1 MByte per MIPS ratio
> is
> > > > > approached if the swap file is included.
> > > > >
> > > > > I suggest you use the performance data available in 'Task Manager'
> > > (select
> > > > > 'Processes', 'View', 'Select Columns') to find out where your
> > bottleneck
> > > > is.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom
> > > > > For communication,
> > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign'
> > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring."
> > > > > replace "dot" with "."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:YRxjc.15038$e4.58@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > > > > The request might have something to do with CPU resources. What
> > might
> > > > not
> > > > > > be noticed with a 3 GHz Pentium 4 in a workstation might be very
> > > > noticable
> > > > > > if the CPU can't keep up with disk bandwidth. Without knowing
> that
> > > keep
> > > > > > piece of information... Amdahl/Case Rule: A balanced computer
> > system
> > > > > needs
> > > > > > about 1 MByte of memory and 1 MByte per second of I/O bandwidth
> per
> > > MIPS
> > > > > of
> > > > > > CPU performance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom
> > > > > > For communication,
> > > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign'
> > > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring."
> > > > > > replace "dot" with "."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote in
> message
> > > > > > news:Oh$p5iHLEHA.2660@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > > > > > Agreed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't think this is a universal issue with Symantec
> > Corporate--my
> > > > > > clients
> > > > > > > haven't run into it--so I suspect this is fixable. Turning
off
> > the
> > > > scan
> > > > > > > should be an absolute last resort, although reasonable for
> > testing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I want to migrate to Linux
    ... Microsoft considers the x86 platform to still be what it was when it was ... Dirty Operating System"; not to be confused with the Q-DOS ... 1.x versions had a GUI called Presentation Manager, from which the Windows ... Thompson has stated that GNU/Linux and cousins are all de facto UNIX ...
    (comp.os.linux.hardware)
  • Re: Newbie to WCE!
    ... Windows CE, which is a full-blown operating system, just like Windows XP, ... the chip maker for the BSP if they have one (there ... All I want to know is can I buy a microcontroller chip (One of the chips ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsce.embedded)
  • Re: masm32
    ... "SOFTWARE PRODUCT. ... of Microsoft Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT 4.0, Windows ... any Microsoft operating system product that is a successor to the ... the foregoing (each a _Microsoft Operating System Product_). ...
    (comp.lang.asm.x86)
  • [Full-disclosure] - IRISH VIRUS - DoS Security Bypass and System access
    ... THE operating system ... Apple Computer Apple DOS ... Windows CE ... LOLDONGS Research, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Banned Town Security ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
    ... re-install has happened more than that. ... Heck, even Steve Ballmer, CEO for Microsoft needs to re-install Windows ... We have an enterprise grade firewall behind the router. ... The main problems I encounter again and again are with clueless operators who've ignored repeated instructions about dangerous surfing practices and clicking on attachments - those are the two most common causes of problems - are they caused by the operating system? ...
    (Fedora)