Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?
From: Phil Weldon (notdisclosed_at_example.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Previous message: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:20:48 GMT
Sorry, another typo. The first sentenced should read "I use Windows 2000
Professional and Windows 2000 Professional Server..." Windows 2000
Professional is the second Windows NT based Microsoft operating system,
preceeding Windows 2000 XP. The two operating systems are similar, and the
"Windows XP Professional Resource Kit" should help answer your questions
about performance monitoring and analysis. Unfortunately the cost is about
$70 US, but it is THE book that should be provided as the manual with
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Operating system... it's just unbundled to
save the average user the extra money.
-- Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom For communication, replace "at" with the 'at sign' replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." replace "dot" with "." "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message news:uHxQq0aLEHA.2012@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > What is the 'Process Viewer' (Pviewer.exe)? > What does "I use Windows 2000 Professional and Windows 2000 Professional" > mean? > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > news:reWjc.16566$e4.10545@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > I use Windows 2000 Professional and Windows 2000 Professional, and I use > the > > 'Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Resource Kit', a 3 kilogram book and > > CD-ROM that is a good source of answers for such questions. I'm sure the > > 'Windows XP Professional Resource Kit' is just as good. The book I have > has > > 165 pages on monitoring and analyzing performance. > > > > There are about 20 columns selectable in 'Task Manager', and the 'Process > > Viewer' (Pviewer.exe) is also useful. > > > > Windows XP 'Help' should give information on how to use performance > counters > > for trouble shooting bottlenecks. > > > > > > > > -- > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > For communication, > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message > > news:uaGKd3SLEHA.2068@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > What Columns to use to find out where the bottleneck is? How to know by > > > numbers in the Column where the bottleneck is? > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > > news:cIOjc.16060$e4.4579@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > > Sorry for the typo. The I/O bandwidth should be 1 Mbit per second, > not > > 1 > > > > MByte per second. The Amdahl/Case Rule is a 'rule of thumb' like > > 'Moore's > > > > Law, and only approximate. A 'Northwood' 1.8 GHz Pentium might have > > 2,400 > > > > MIPS, indicating 2.4 GBytes memory and 2.4 GBits I/O bandwidth by the > > > > Amdahl/Case Rule. The I/O bandwidth for a 32-bit, 33 MHz PCI bus > would > > be > > > > 32 X 33 MHz ~= 1 GBit/second. The I/O bandwidth for a 32-bit 66 MHz X > 8 > > > AGP > > > > bus would be ~= 16 GBit/second, but much of the AGP bus bandwidth is > > > unused > > > > for most applications. A 66 MHz 64-bit PCI bus is available on server > > > > motherboards and a faster replacement for the PCI bus is soon to > appear > > in > > > > general motherboards; server applications approach the 1 MByte per > MIPS > > > > ratio, and for general workstation use, the 1 MByte per MIPS ratio is > > > > approached if the swap file is included. > > > > > > > > I suggest you use the performance data available in 'Task Manager' > > (select > > > > 'Processes', 'View', 'Select Columns') to find out where your > bottleneck > > > is. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > > For communication, > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > > > news:YRxjc.15038$e4.58@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > > > The request might have something to do with CPU resources. What > might > > > not > > > > > be noticed with a 3 GHz Pentium 4 in a workstation might be very > > > noticable > > > > > if the CPU can't keep up with disk bandwidth. Without knowing that > > keep > > > > > piece of information... Amdahl/Case Rule: A balanced computer > system > > > > needs > > > > > about 1 MByte of memory and 1 MByte per second of I/O bandwidth per > > MIPS > > > > of > > > > > CPU performance. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > > > For communication, > > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote in message > > > > > news:Oh$p5iHLEHA.2660@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think this is a universal issue with Symantec > Corporate--my > > > > > clients > > > > > > haven't run into it--so I suspect this is fixable. Turning off > the > > > scan > > > > > > should be an absolute last resort, although reasonable for > testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Previous message: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|