Re: openxml question
- From: "Mike C#" <xyz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:08:58 -0500
Yes the arguments are pretty much the same. Other than adding XML data type
support, I'm not aware of any changes to the inner workings of OPENXML. If
you're using SQL 2005, you might try using the nodes() method of the XML
data type to shred your XML data instead.
<DAXU@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7da00930-9135-4ea6-9438-b2276eccdc1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I read a document from MSDN saying that:
Avoid OPENXML over large XML documents.
Avoid large numbers of concurrent OPENXML statements over XML
documents.
But my question is: how to define large? Is there some suggestion
saying for example that a 100kb xml file will be too big? Or 100
concurrent openxml will be to match for the system?
The document on msdn can be found at:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms998577.aspx
The document was written in 2004. Are the arguments valid for both sql
2000 and 2995?
Many Thanks
Jerry
.
- References:
- openxml question
- From: DAXU
- openxml question
- Prev by Date: openxml question
- Next by Date: Re: openxml question
- Previous by thread: openxml question
- Next by thread: Re: openxml question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading