Re: Bug in SQLXML
From: Irwin Dolobowsky[MS] (irwind_at_mail.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/18/04
- Next message: Irwin Dolobowsky[MS]: "Re: Bulkload - permissions"
- Previous message: itvnboy: "Help me : export from SQL --> XML file, import XML -->SQL"
- In reply to: Chris: "Re: Bug in SQLXML"
- Next in thread: Peter Stokes: "Re: Bug in SQLXML"
- Reply: Peter Stokes: "Re: Bug in SQLXML"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:40:57 -0800
Does it repro in SP2? If so I can file a bug.
-- Irwin Dolobowsky Program Manager - SqlXml http://weblogs.asp.net/irwando This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Chris" <a@abc.com> wrote in message news:#$YlKjbBEHA.2584@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Hi Peter, > > I can confirm that bug within SqlXml 3.0Sp1 I think b1. A joined table with > a bit column returns always 0 if the result of the query is rendered to XML > with "FOR XML NESTED" clause. > > Two ways to get around: > > 1. Use the clause "FOR XML RAW" and render the output with a xslt style*** > 2. Use a cast statment for the bit colomn and render it to a string, e.g. > CAST(MyTable.Active AS NVARCHAR(1)) AS Active > > Hope that helps. > > Christian > > "Peter Stokes" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:D71A19B0-5431-4A9F-9B6A-82500725E4DC@microsoft.com... > > All, > > > > I have a stored procedure which joins three nested tables. When I use the > SQLXML managed classes for .NET to return this stored procedure as an > xmlreader something strange happens. > > > > In the top level table there is a boolean column. In the database the > value of this column in the rows being returned is 1. However in the xml > being returned the element has a value of 0. When I change the stored > procedure and only return rows from the top level table it returns the xml > correctly > > > > Has anyone else experienced this? > > > >
- Next message: Irwin Dolobowsky[MS]: "Re: Bulkload - permissions"
- Previous message: itvnboy: "Help me : export from SQL --> XML file, import XML -->SQL"
- In reply to: Chris: "Re: Bug in SQLXML"
- Next in thread: Peter Stokes: "Re: Bug in SQLXML"
- Reply: Peter Stokes: "Re: Bug in SQLXML"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]