Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- From: Always OpenTo Suggestions <AlwaysOpenToSuggestions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:34:01 -0700
Duh - I should have figured that one out! Based on this, my plan will be:
-- Keep the Recover Model FULL
-- Do differential backups hourly during the day.
-- Do full backups at night.
Seems like this would allow Point-In-Time recovery with a much smaller
transaction file.
Did I interpret your suggestions properly?
Thanx in advance - I really do appreciate the help!
Angelo Michel
"Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]" wrote:
If you want the benefits of full recovery model without the log growth you.
are experiencing, then back up the log more often between full backups!
On 10/13/08 2:04 PM, in article
E84FFBD1-83A4-472A-91A0-C8C6CA2737B7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Always OpenTo
Suggestions" <AlwaysOpenToSuggestions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But if I keep the recovery model SIMPLE - wouldn't that eliminate the ability
to restore transactions to a point in time. I was hoping that turning the
recovery model to SIMPLE would trim the transaction log and that putting it
back to FULL would allow recovery to a point in time.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- From: Tibor Karaszi
- Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- References:
- Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- From: Always OpenTo Suggestions
- Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- From: Tibor Karaszi
- Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- From: Always OpenTo Suggestions
- Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- From: Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]
- Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- Prev by Date: Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- Next by Date: Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- Previous by thread: Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- Next by thread: Re: Trimming HUGE Transaction Log
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|